Commander's Column: What if the Confederacy had
Prevailed?
My daughter is
in fourth grade and has been studying 19th century Alabama history including
the Confederacy and the War Between the States.
I was excited to hear she was even learning about Forrest capturing
Streight with the aid of Emma Sansom.
She asked me one evening what would be different had the Confederacy won
the War for Southern Independence. I
struggled a bit in succinctly answering her question especially expressing
myself simply for a fourth grader. We
are seeing today the impact of the fateful results of the War Between the
States with the growth of a large central federal government with trillion
dollar debt and redistributive entitlement liabilities as well as overbearing
taxes and intrusive laws and regulations.
But in addition
to greater state sovereignty, pushing
governance closer to the people which was the impetus for the 1860 secession
movement, what other differences might have been observed had the Confederacy
prevailed either thru a negotiated peace or victory in defense of their
Southern homeland? It has been
speculated that there may have been less racial animus with a planned
systematic emancipation of the slaves as it was generally recognized that the
institution was drawing to an end with industrialization of the economy
including agriculture with the dawn mechanized tooling and the internal
combustion engine. There likely would have been less US imperialism at the end
of the 19th century especially the westward march across the North American
continent with the development and rapid statehood of those territories. Maybe no Trail of Tears and no slaughter of
the vast herds of bison across the plains especially considering the inclusive
position Native Americans held in the Confederate forces.
Had the
Southern states not been subject to the torched earth campaign of the Union
Army under Grant and Sherman, it would be logical to think the
Industrialization of the South would have been expedited had a rebuilding under
Reconstruction not been a part of Atlanta and Columbia SC history. The Confederate States of America likely
would have quickly developed into a world power with extensive maritime trade
considering the expansive coastline and bustling ports like Mobile and
Charleston. Control of the Mississippi
River regulating shipping of goods from the US heartland might have been a
continuing source of conflict with the country to the north as it proved to be pivotal
in the WBTS at New Orleans and Vicksburg.
But the South’s belief in low tariff trade would likely had led to rapid
economic growth with the US and with Europe.
“The South would have had important leverage (with)control of the
Mississippi River Delta and therefore of the river trade that proved so
important in developing the American Midwest.
The CSA would also have been in a better geographical position to
exercise influence in the Caribbean Sea.
A negotiated separation may well have preserved the deep economic
interdependencies between north and south, avoided and contained the passions
expressed during the Civil War, and allowed for a form of peaceful
coexistence.”
(nationalinterest.org/feature/if-the-civil-war-had-different-ending-10814?page=2)
This article
also speculated the relocation of Washington DC would have been likely to
relieve the proximity of the capital to the Confederate States. The 1898
Spanish American War might not have happened in the same way as one or the
other North or South may have allied with Spain and Cuba for military or
economic strategic positioning. “If the
strongest advocates for a weaker federal government had left the union rather
than remaining within it, would the United States have tilted further in the
direction of federal power and northeast/liberal political and social values,
with the populous east more easily dominating independent-minded settlers in
the American West? If so, how would the
US political system have reacted to the rise of the labor movement? Might the USA today look more like European
Union countries today?” A division of
North and South might have impacted the United States destiny as a superpower
in the 20th century. Might there have
been a different outcome to the World Wars and perhaps a repeat of the War
Between the States with deadlier weapons.
No doubt there would have existed for a period of time ingle party
political systems with the Republicans dominating Northern and Democrats
dominating Southern political landscapes.
(nationalinterest.org)
I believe we
have many patriots in the Sons of Confederate Veterans and in the Prattville
Dragoons who love their country but who also love their Southern heritage. Even though the South did not prevail in
their quest for independence, Southern values and ideals have helped shape our
nation’s history since the War Between the States. There have been countless heroic Southern
soldiers who have defended America in conflicts since the WBTS and there have
been countless leaders of industry and politics even Presidents of our unified
country since the 19th century. The
influence of the returning soldiers who had experienced a revival in their
camps was great on society and these men founded many churches across the Bible
Belt and maintained a moral spiritual foundation for the country even thru the
hardship of Reconstruction. Not to mention the culinary delight which is
Southern cooking – there is a reason you never heard of Yankee or Northern
cuisine. It most certainly would have been a different history for the past 157
years since the formation of the Confederacy and a different world in which we
live had our ancestors been left alone as Jefferson Davis implored or had they
prevailed on the battlefield. We should
be equally proud of our past and present Southern history and culture as well
as our modern US history and hopeful in its future as we seek to positively
influence its destiny.
No comments:
Post a Comment