Commander's Column – Recognizing Race and Racial Tolerance
Elsewhere in
this newsletter, compatriot Tyrone Crowley provides a history of the term
racist and the evolution of its connotation.
I recalled that it was fashionable just a short time ago by the PC
progressives in an effort to break down socially constructed barriers to
maintain that there is no such thing as race.
This article (https://www.sapiens.org/body/is-race-real/) attempts to
minimize a racial construct as a “tenuous flexible” assumptive exercise, using
anthropological double speak like “local populations” to discount any notion of
the logical clarity of race. They use
outlier exceptions as the grounds for discounting the fact that due to
geographic and cultural factors, races have developed over the millenniums such
that not just outward appearance lends itself to the grouping of racial
populations but for example sciences such as forensic musculoskeletal and cardiovascular differences between the
races can be used to place race discounting any recognition of outward
markers. It is simply humorous
delusional fantasy to disregard and ignore the inherent differences between the
races akin to placing credence in one’s ability to ”self-identify” as a
different race or sex and be granted such recognition.
So if the
notion of races is a social construct then why do recent studies by the
University of Toronto “indicate that racial bias may arise in babies as young
as six to nine months of age”? (https://www.utoronto.ca/news/racial-bias-may-begin-babies-six-months-u-t-research-reveals) Without any supporting evidence except
limited sample populations in their own studies, the researchers said “that
lack of exposure to other races may be the cause.” The research correlated babies happiness and
learning as enhanced when exposed to their own races placing this entirely on
familiarity with their own and not on negative experiences with other
races. The study seems to draw this
conclusion without substantiating evidence and ignores other possibilities such
as instinctual causation such as is observed within species in the greater
animal kingdom. But, even so, should
the importance of the child’s consistent ethnic cultural factors be discounted
or minimized in their thriving, their happiness and learning? Do the Japanese or Chinese or Korean or
Indian or Nigerian people believe that diversity is an imperative to make their
societies stronger, better, more successful or fulfilling for their citizens?
We were
watching the television recently in the wake of this Black Lives Matters
pandemic and noted an opinion piece presented as an advertisement where a black
woman wanted “us” to not see her by the color of her skin and in the same
breath wanted us to appreciate her black culture and embrace their “African-American”
experience. (An aside, please check out
this post by the Hodge Twins regarding the use of thee term African-American -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxC7IpgJNe8 .)
The entire American corporate industrial complex bent over backwards
patronizing the Black Lives Matter movement in the wake of the death of the
drugged career criminal in Minneapolis.
The virtue signaling white guilt pandering reached a sickening crescendo
as exemplified by the CEO of Chick fil A in deference shining his black
television host rappers’ shoes in repentance for the shame of the country’s
systemic racism. (The Hodge Twins have
something to say about the farce of “systemic racism” in America too.) But if race does not exist, why is it
suddenly taboo to proclaim that All Lives Matter and not just those trumpeting
the anti-establishment (socialist anti-capitalist), anti-law enforcement
Marxist LGBQT agenda of the Black Lives Matter peaceful demonstrators? Why does this Time article (https://time.com/5846072/black-people-protesting-white-people-responsible-what-happens-next/)
condemn “whiteness” as THE source of “racial pain” and instituting an American
culture built on oppressive white supremacy if races do not even exist?
No comments:
Post a Comment